0:00
/

“This Is Classic Third Reich Stuff”

A Q&A with Minnesota AG Keith Ellison. Plus: Gary, still in the dark. Trump’s billion-dollar pardon tab. Bond blues. The Pentagon targets its own press. Who is Natalie Harp? And flying without fuel.

For daily news, updates, and analysis, be sure to follow us on Instagram. If you are able to support independent journalism, please make a tax-deductible donation to News Not Noise here.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is suing Texas Gov. Greg Abbott for refusing to honor a request to extradite an ICE agent facing criminal charges in Minnesota. Agent Christian Castro faces multiple charges stemming from the shooting of a man during an immigration raid, including allegedly giving a false account of what happened. Abbott says he won’t sign the extradition papers until Minnesota repays federal money lost to fraud, a demand with no legal relevance to the case.

Today I spoke to Ellison about the case. He called Abbott’s refusal “anti-constitutional” and said it “defies precedent.” If Castro leaves the country, Ellison told me, “There is no escape. He’s going to stand trial in Minnesota.”

We also discussed the investigations into the killings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti. Ellison says federal authorities have handed over some evidence, but Minnesota is still waiting for the complete files. On J.D. Vance, who has called for Ellison to be investigated over fraud in Minnesota, Ellison was unsparing: “I don’t think Vance has cognitive issues. I think he has moral issues.”

On today’s news that Trump’s Education Department is moving to strip the American Bar Association of its role accrediting law schools, Ellison said, “This is classic Third Reich stuff,” saying, “Show me a totalitarian society and I will show you a government that wants to punish lawyers, punish academics, punish journalists, punish anyone and anyone who might say that what they’re doing is wrong.”

He does not mince words or shy away from a fight. Find our full conversation at the top of this email.

PS: My fancy camera decided not to cooperate today, so we went with the backup. Hence the slightly strange framing. But more importantly: Do you like the new wall color?


Also in this newsletter: 10 days without power. The court weighs in on the ballroom. The cost of Trump’s pardons. Why you should care about the bond market. Trump’s new fight with lawyers. Trump’s devoted assistant under scrutiny. Women rally for Lindsay Clancy. And in News That Doesn’t Suck, electric flight just got real.

News Not Noise is a reader-supported publication. To receive exclusive content and support our work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Here Are Your Headlines

Share

  • The Name’s Bond: Financial experts and governments around the world are increasingly worried about the U.S. bond market and what it may signal about the U.S. economy. This week Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the Treasury would “at least” double some of its purchases of long-term bonds. That’s called a buyback. It didn’t go as likely planned. To understand why that matters, here’s a quick bond-market primer: Bonds are essentially loans to the government. The yield on a bond is the return investors demand for lending the government money. When investors demand higher yields, it costs the government more to borrow and more to service its enormous debt. Those higher rates can ripple through the economy. This week Bessent announced a buyback to drive yields lower. It worked, but only briefly. Within hours, yields were climbing again back near 20-year highs. Experts say Bessent’s move didn’t produce an enduring response because it didn’t address the bigger forces that are pushing yields higher. Those forces include stubbornly high inflation, which makes bonds worth less, so investors demand a better return to keep buying them. Investors are also worried about record U.S. debt and the unpredictability of Trump’s economic policies. Bessent’s buyback was, ironically, part of that story. Treasury buybacks are usually announced on a schedule. This one was unexpected. Why should you care? The bond market is a measure of investor confidence in the U.S. economy, and some experts note yields haven’t been this high since before the Great Recession. Higher yields also mean the U.S. has to spend more just to pay interest on its debt, leaving less money for everything else. And, perhaps most importantly for you, bond yields help drive the rates Americans pay on all kinds of major loans, including mortgages and car loans. Those rates are already high. And there’s the political aspect: The bond market is one place investors are registering their concern about Trump’s policies.

    • How Strange: Bessent this week admitted to reporters he didn’t “really understand” why oil prices had spiked, dismissing them as “noise.” In the words of a Fox News host, “Literally everyone else knows” why prices spiked. Just one day earlier, Trump announced “the most crushing economic operation ever taken against any country,” threatening “tremendous economic consequences” for any nation helping Iran.

  • Anti-Accreditation: The Education Department formally recommended stripping the American Bar Association’s authority to accredit law schools when it comes up for renewal next month. The ABA reviews nearly 200 law schools. Its accreditation can determine whether schools qualify for federal student loan funds and, in many states, whether graduates can sit for the bar exam. This is a sharp escalation in the Trump administration’s longstanding feud with the ABA, which Republicans accuse of having a liberal bias. The group won a lawsuit against the Justice Department last year, after arguing the DOJ illegally canceled millions of dollars in grants for domestic violence and sexual assault services because the ABA had criticized the administration. The ABA also suspended a diversity rule for law schools shortly after Trump took office. Trump has called accreditation his “secret weapon” to influence and reshape higher education, and critics warn he is trying to use it to pressure schools to fall in line with his views. “This is classic Third Reich stuff,” Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison told News Not Noise. He said he thinks this effort against the ABA won’t succeed. (Watch the rest of our conversation at the top of this newsletter.)

  • Failed By the System: Lindsay Clancy’s defense rested its case, arguing she should not be held criminally responsible for killing her three children because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. Multiple witnesses, including Clancy’s family members, testified about her devotion to her children and declining mental health before their deaths. Clancy’s former mother-in-law described her as a “wonderful mother” who was “begging for help.” A psychologist who treated her after the killings testified she had a “mental disease” and said government psychiatric testing found no evidence she was exaggerating or faking her symptoms. “She really loves” her children, the psychologist testified, “and thinks of them every single day.” Hundreds of supporters, mostly women, gathered outside the courthouse, many wearing pink shirts emblazoned with phrases like “She Needed Help.” They rallied to support Clancy and call attention to the failures in women’s mental health care. “Women are being dismissed, neglected and ignored when we speak up,” one attendee said. “We’re scared because nobody takes us seriously.”

News That Doesn’t Suck

  • Uplifting News, Literally: If you’ve taken a flight recently, you’ll know first-hand how much prices have skyrocketed. That’s largely due to fuel costs, which are up 70% from last year, thanks to rising oil prices. “High oil prices will inevitably mean higher ticket prices,” the director general of an airlines group said. “There’s just no way to avoid that.” That might not be true for much longer. A company called Heart Aerospace just successfully flew a 30-seat jet for 27 minutes, powered entirely by a battery. No jet fuel involved, at all. It’s the largest fully battery-powered aircraft ever flown. Electric flight has a few major advantages. For one thing, it’s greener. Air travel accounts for 2.5% of total CO2 emissions, and replacing just 10% of current fuel demand would mean saving 700,000 barrels of oil per day. Electric engines are also quieter and could be over 40% cheaper to operate compared to traditional ones. They have fewer moving parts and could be charged with locally generated electricity, providing more independence from the all-too capricious oil market. The main problem is that batteries are simply too heavy. So manufacturers like Heart Aerospace are starting with hybrids. Major airlines are interested; these small planes could be perfect for regional flights. It will likely be years before they’re taking passengers in the air, but this voyage represents a major step forward in the field of electric flight. If things develop like they did for cars, that field might arrive sooner than you’d think. Would you take an electric flight?

Share

Want more information?

Please share this newsletter with family, friends, and anyone who wants to get the news and turn down the noise. If you’d like to sponsor our newsletter or our Instagram content, please reach out to us at community@newsnotnoise.com.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?